lit

Version, currently 0.2.03 versions

github.com/lit-lang/lit

The Lit Programming Language

12 stars
0 dependents
License: MIT

Nothing has been indexed for 0.2.0 yet. The tag is recorded, its shard.yml has not been read, so the manifest and dependency list below are empty because they are unknown rather than because they are absent.

Installation

# Add this to your shard.yml
dependencies:
  lit:
    github: lit-lang/lit
    version: ~> 0.2.0

Then run:

shards install

shard.yml

No shard.yml has been indexed for 0.2.0. You can read it on the repository.

Dependencies

Unknown: the shard.yml for this version has not been read yet.

README

This README is the one indexed from the repository at its latest ref, not from the tag for this version.

<p align="center">
  <img src="assets/icon.png" height="130px">

  <h3 align="center">Lit</h3>
  <p align="center"><em>A simple scripting language</em></p>

  <p align="center">
    <a href="https://matheusrich.gitbook.io/lit/" target="_blank">
      <strong>Take a look at the Documentation &raquo</strong>
    </a>
    <br><br>
    <a href="https://matheusrich.gitbook.io/lit/faq" target="_blank">FAQ</a>
    &middot;
    <a href="https://github.com/MatheusRich/lit-vscode" target="_blank">VS Code extension</a>
    &middot;
    <a href="https://github.com/MatheusRich/lit/issues/new">Report a Problem</a>
  </p>
</p>

<hr>

> ATTENTION: This project is a work in progress! It's an experiment and by no means a
> production-ready language.

```ruby
module Factorial {
  fn of { |n|
    if n <= 1 then return 1

    n * Factorial.of(n - 1)
  }
}

if let n = readln.to_n!() {
  println "Factorial of {n} is {Factorial.of(n)}"
} else {
  println "Not a valid number"
}
```

## Why?

_So, yet another scripting language. What's the deal?_

I'm primarily a Ruby developer, and I love the workflow of a scripting language!
I never felt the need for type annotations in Ruby, but I often saw instances of
`undefined method 'something' for nil` errors in production code.

I thought _"How can I get rid of this kind of error without going all the way down to full static typing?"_.
That's how Lit was born.

### Enter Lit

Lit indeed has some static typing, but it is _subtle_. Let's get back to the factorial example, in
particular this part:

```ruby
if let n = readln.to_n!() {
  println "Factorial of {n} is {Factorial.of(n)}"
} else {
  println "Not a valid number"
}
```

What happens is that `readln` returns a string, and `to_n!` tries to convert it to an integer. But
what happens if the string is not a valid number? What should `"wut".to_n!()` do? I'm not sure, so
`to_n!` returns an error. The exclamation mark at the end of `to_n!` is a _type annotation_ that
means it's a _"dangerous"_ method.

If a method is marked as dangerous, we have to handle it. Here are some alternatives:

1. Provide a default value:

```rust
let n = readln.to_n!() or 0
```

2. Panic/Exit the program:

```rust
let n = readln.to_n!() or { panic "not a valid number" }
```

3. Propagate the error:

```rust
fn read_number! {
  let n = readln
  n = n.to_n!() or { return err("Not a number") } # caller decides how to handle the error

  n
}
```

4. You can also use `if let` and `while let` to handle errors:

```rust
if let n = readln.to_n!() {
  println "{n} is a number"
} else {
  println "Not a valid number"
}

while let n = readln.to_n!() {
  println "Yay! {n} is a number"
} else {
  println "Not a valid number"
}
```

## Goals

Lit is my first attempt at language design. My goals are:

- **Be straightforward**:
  - If the same concept/syntax could be used in other parts of the language, great!
  - It is interpreted because this keeps things simpler.
- **Be functional-friendly**:
  - It has to have good function support (anonymous functions, composition, pipe operator).
  - Help with immutability.
- **Light static typing**:
  - No type annotations (in the usual sense);
  - No `undefined method 'x' for nil` errors;
  - It still has to feel like a scripting language.
- **Be pretty:**
  - I'm a Rubyist, after all. So, beautiful code matters.
  - I want to keep the language consistent, though.
- **Don't take it too serious**:
  - This is my first language, so I want it to be fun (and learn from experience);
  - Speed is not a priority.

## Installation

You have to build the project from source 🙃.

## Docs

You can find the documentation [here](https://matheusrich.gitbook.io/lit/).

## Development

To build the project, you need to have Crystal installed. If you use [asdf](https://asdf-vm.com/), you
can install it with:

```sh
asdf install
```

Then, you can build the project with:

```sh
tools/build-dev
```

This will be a development build, and you can run the executable with:

```sh
bin/lit
```

For the release build, you can use:

```sh
tools/build
```

## Inspiration

[Ruby], of course, is my primary source of inspiration for how a scripting language should feel. Due
to my limited knowledge of creating a programming language, I went with [JavaScript]-like syntax.
There's also [Rust] and [V] sprinkled in the mix.

[Ruby]: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/
[Rust]: https://www.rust-lang.org/
[V]: https://vlang.io/
[JavaScript]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript

## Acknowledgements

First and foremost, I'd like to thank Bob Nystrom for his incredible book [Crafting Interpreters],
which made it possible for me to start writing this language. If you can, please consider buying
it.

I also would like to thank all the [languages](#inspiration) that inspired me, and you for reading this!

[Crafting Interpreters]: https://craftinginterpreters.com/

## Contributing

1. Fork it (<https://github.com/your-github-user/lit/fork>)
2. Create your feature branch (`git checkout -b my-new-feature`)
3. Commit your changes (`git commit -am 'Add some feature'`)
4. Push to the branch (`git push origin my-new-feature`)
5. Create a new Pull Request